or- Why would you pay for that?
I have had a lot of people contact me lately about a interesting flaw in Windows XP. It seams that if you try to view large video files in Explorer, or click to get file information, the CPU spikes to 100% for....hours. It seems that just another fatle flaw has appeared in the OS that just can't seem to get fixed.
In the past, Microsoft has done what every other software company seems to do...drop crap on the market. Maybe crap is harsh, as the article I first read on this site ( and made me want to write for), it seems perfectly acceptable to release half assed versions of their software. Windows ME would probably be the best example, requiring so much work that MS scrapped it as soon as XP was released. Coincidently, when Windows 98 was about to be retired, quietly in the background so was ME. But, the public cried out and MS held off. Fortunately, they didn't with Win ME.
When XP was first released, in the dark days before SP1, MS offered a "Upgrade" version of Windows XP, which, in theory is sound. But, since the software isn't installing XP on your computer, just upgrading it to XP standards, it worked out for the worst. Instead of fixing the problem, they left them on the market.
But, I am trailing off the topic.
The 'fix' for this 100% CPU usage (which can last up to a day, apparently), can be recieved from Microsoft for the small sum of $35 US. Wait, do you mean that we would need to PAY for this fix? It seems a little crazy that of all the hotfixes, security fixes, and Critical Updates, that this would cost you money. Why? Because it is a nasty problem. Having gotten this fix for free throught my Developers Windows XP kit, it doesn't affect me. Only, it doesn't work too well after SP1a, which is the majority of the shipped XP software is.
So, why are we paying for it? Sure, you could wait until it is released ( The Microsoft Tech said it would be released sometime next year) or you can buy it. Is it fair that a software company that gives you little choice as to your choice of OS, charge you to fix it's own program?