Ramblings, just ramblings
Blue Ray or HD-DVD?
Published on September 30, 2005 By Amitty In Personal Computing
It is the battle of VHS vs. Beta all over again. The big guns are starting to pick their sides in the next 'media revolution', that being the next form of media for us lucky consumers to buy.

That is correct, Dorothy, there is a new Standard coming out. The much touted BlueRay discs vs HD-DVD. The Playstation 3, one of hte most expected game consoles, is going with a Blue Ray format, which allows up to 50 Gigs of storage on the disc. Blue Ray has been expected to take the crown as the next winner, but as we saw with VHS and Beta, sometiems it's not how good it is, it is who your friends and supporters are.

The one worse thing that happened with Beta is that it wasn't backed as a winner. Beta, to almost everyone you talk to that KNOWS about tape technology will tell you that Beta was superior. But companies like Sony and the like chose to back VHS. SOmetimes it takes a slick salesman.

Now, Microsoft has decided to back the darkhorse, HD-DVD. When Microsoft and Intel, their pet processor company, announced that they would back HD-DVD, many asked why. Was it because Microsoft wouldn't support something backed by a competitor, especially one inb the gaming market that it is trying to become king of the hill in? no, that is silly. One of Microsoft's Compression codecs support HD-DVD and Blue Ray. It is also known that Microsoft and Sony have had a profitable life together as business partners with the Sony Viao line of computers.

So, why?

Making copies of media is currently illegal in the United States, and Microsoft wants to change that. HD-DVD is, so far, the only media that allows a user to make a legal copy of optical content. Currently, HD DVD is the only next-gen format to provide for the ability to legally make copies of optical content. Dubbed "Managed Copy," HD DVD implements part of the AACS control mechanism to allow for things such as putting digital copies of a disc on a hard drive, transferring a movie (legally) to a portable player, or streaming content on a home network. Furthermore, HD DVD makes Managed Copy mandatory: all content provided on HD DVD must give users the option of making at least one copy. Jordi Ribas, director of technical strategy for the Windows Digital Media Division, told me that while the feature is mandatory, the studios will have the option of charging for it. Ribas hopes that studios will allow at least a single copy "for free," but it may be market conditions that ultimately determine the cost of such features. The take-away, at least, is that studios have to offer something, and AACS is structured in such a way that the studios can tap into it to offer users more options.

Furthermore, because Managed Copy is part of the AACS specification, this isn't a feature exclusive to Microsoft or Intel solutions. While both companies believe that their respective products (Media Center Edition, and Viiv, respectively) will shine in a world were Managed Copy is available, AACS defines a set of requirements that technically any company could aspire to, be it Apple, Motorola, or another player in the game.

What about Blu-ray? Currently, Blu-ray has announced no such mandatory support. There are also plenty of questions about whether or not Blu-ray will entertain this option. The Blu-ray Disc Association so far has adopted AACS conditionally; it is still subject to review. Furthermore, Blu-ray to date has adopted content protections above and beyond AACS, adding BD+ and ROM-Mark to their arsenal. Such added protections appear to be part of an appeasement plan: the studios want more than AACS protection, at least least some of them do.

It is interesting from the point of view that Blue Ray, as the harbringer of technologies have stated since it was introduced, is considered the new standard before anyone else said anyone. Blu-Ray has much love and support in the market for it, and production is on the way for at home products using it. IT is also interesting to note that Blu-Ray can be used with the current processing technology and HD-DVD is more expensive to produce.

So, who will win? Whoever has the most influential friends, of course.

Comments
on Sep 30, 2005

But companies like Sony and the like chose to back VHS.

Definitely not correct there....Sony was one of the biggest proponents of their Betamax format....only going to VHS when the latter had Beta dead in the water with Sony the only one left using it...

on Sep 30, 2005
You know, you are correct sir, but I had to check and did some research, thank you for the catch.
on Oct 01, 2005
"IT is also interesting to note that Blu-Ray can be used with the current processing technology and HD-DVD is more expensive to produce."

Incorrect. HD-DVD involves some minor retooling and would allow consumers to continue using current DVD players with HD-DVD/DVD discs until they upgraded to HD-DVD player/recorders. However, HD-DVD to date is only vaporware and has no working consumer prototype. Sony's PS3 will be Blue Ray and will attract gamers but no one expects a proprietary media to play in their home theatre system. There is a certain expectation that my DVDs will continue to be backward compatible with my exixting equipment until I choose to upgrade (read that as "when the market hits an acceptable price point for consumers"). While we're at it let's clarify that the HD in HD-DVD means "High Density", not High Deffinition as in HDTV, and concerns capacity, not resolution. From Sony's standpoint, I can understand wanting a single disc that contains all the data needed for a complex game, without the need for memory cards or multi-disc swapping. From a home theatre/movie perspective, all higher density/capacity means is additional "features" (garbage) added to the disc. Honestly, how many people actually watch the movie with the commentary soundtrack on, or take the time to watch the "making of" stuff with "director's comments"? You nailed the truth of the matter on the head when you mentioned the multiple copy protection schemes planned for Blue Ray. HD-DVD would still allow copying of the movie/media with exisiting equipment/software. I won't enter a moral debate on copying. Suffice it to say that DVD copying/authoring software isn't wildly popular for no reason. Not when you can strip out the "features" and still have a high quality, high resolution DVD movie. God forbid the MPAA and studios should produce and release DVDs without all the "extras". They could'nt justify the continuing increasing price (profits) of retail DVDs. They missed the boat with the current DVD recorders/players when they were still selling VHS tapes while the digital/computer market moved toward DVD without their influence and control. It happened to the RIAA and recording industry as well when they ignored MP3 formats. So now they want us all to roll over while they make amends for that by changing the entire format and taking control of the market (electronic markets as well). Oh please! This is so obvious. I for one will loudly cheer on MS and Intel for taking a stand and protecting their turf. Why in the world would they want to support something they would have to have license agreements with just to allow their consumers to use the Blue Ray discs? It's not just a matter of a few new codecs to use. You're talking whole new base design for electronics and software just to use the darn things. Especially now that they are moving away from AGP graphics arrays toward PCI Express standards? Why would you want to allow the entertainment industry into your domain and dictate design and compatability in something they have no experience or expertise with? It never was about copyright infringement. It was always about control and of course new profit markets.